prime building land

WITH THE DEBATE ABOUT THE LOOK OF THE FRONT OF THE SITE BEING SWITCHED TO WEEDS WE CAN
EAT ,WHICH PERSONNALY I FOUND QUITE INTERESTING BUT IS A DEBATE FOR ANOTHER DAY.
THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THE ALLOTMENT SITE HAS FOR MANY YEARS BEEN UNDER THREAT FROM
LAND SPECULATORS.
SOME YEARS AGO THE BIG STORY ON THE SITE WAS OF A PLAN THAT WOULD HAVE PIPES LAID ON THE STREAM
SIDE THAT WOULD BE FILLED IN AND A PATH And CYCLE LANE PUT ON TOP OF IT.
A ROAD PUT THROUGH AND HOUSES BUILT.
HOW TRUE I DONT KNOW.
BUT BEARING IN MIND ,THAT I UNDERSTAND FROM YOU MURRAY,IN A CONVERSATION SOME FEW MONTHS
AGO THAT THERE IS SOME SORT OF BUILDING PLAN FOR THE LAND AT THE BACK OF THE SITE THEN AS 
MISS MARPLES WOULD SAY, ONE HAS TO BE ON ONES GUARD ALL THE TIME.
      WHICH LEADS US TO JANES STATE MENT THAT THE FRONT OF THE SITE NEEDS TO BE KEPT IN SPICK
AND SPAN CONDITION.
WHICH I HEARTILY AGREE WITH.
AS DID THE LATE PADDY HENRY.
THE LOOK OF THE SITE  FROM A REMPASSERSBY VIEWPOINT IS OF PARROMOUNT IMPORTANCE TO KEEPING THE
SITE
     REMEMBER DAVID WITHOUT A SITE YOU CANNOT GROW ANYTHING WHETHER IT BE WEEDS TO EAT
OR STANDARD VEGETABLES